Evidence and proving in constitutional proceedings: doctrinal aspects

It was noted that the realities of social life, political situation, global processes transformation phenomena and require legal accuracy in understanding fundamental prescriptions specified by Constitution, as well ensuring compliance legislation with its provisions. Regarding first question, there are two ways solving it: detailing provisions, which to a certain extent creates bulky codified texts difficult apply, or clear, comprehensive formulations constitutional norms, provide for establishment principles functioning state power society, without detailed extended texts. institution judicial evidence proceedings is not carefully regulated criminal, arbitration civil cases.
 indicated court process special environment differs from other existing our country: field activity, powers bodies, subjects, stages, force decisions. Peculiarities where proof carried out certainly give rise specificity subject proof, content types proof. This need more regulation proceedings. In opinion, type cognitive order established law covers activities subjects involved And therefore, knowledge proceedings, at same time it represents combination bothcognitive procedural activities. The component characterizes cognition, characterizesthe form cognition takes within framework rules justice. At time, construction follows (corresponds) adopted national law. However, we draw your attention, would be worthwhile normalize aimed issues.